SafeShepherd removes your personal information from websites that sell it. Are you exposed? Find out at SafeShepherd.com

Find my Info
  • Don’t Make Me Tell Congress On You…

    2012-05-30

    The majority of people search websites provide opt out policies on their websites.  Those sites balance the public availability of personal information with personal control over that information (or at least the aggregated version of the information people search sites sell).  As a result, there hasn’t been a huge push to legislate online people search.

    HOWEVER not every site is a good people search citizen.  Some, like DOBsearch.com, treat the law as the limit of what they must do regarding privacy rather than as a minimum of what they should do.  DOBsearch.com does not have an opt-out policy on their site and their privacy policy is… just enough to be compliant with California’s Online Privacy Protection Act. 

    Their FAQ suggests that they won’t let you opt out of their database searches because that would alter the reflection of what information is publicly available.  The FAQ creates the impression that the only way to remove your records from their search results is to have them removed from the public record.  To do that you generally need a court order, which is a hefty requirement.  Furthermore, DOBsearch’s FAQ creates the impression that public records are an all or nothing proposition where a middle way exists and works well.

    There are good reasons to have records that are public but not available via people search sites.  Information about who is the true owner of land, mineral rights and cars allows better accountability in the event of theft or trespass and in the event of a negligence lawsuit.  Allowing specific public information to be accessed by individuals with a legitimate need while removing that same information from aggregated online searches is perfectly reasonable. 

    What places like this are missing is that if you stand on the edge of legality you’re likely to erode that edge.  At the moment, society relies on the good intentions of people search websites and the difficulties that come with data aggregation (time, technical skill and in the case of private data banks, cost).  The twin protections of good intentions and difficulty aren’t bullet proof, but as long as both remain intact the balance between data freedom and privacy is maintained.

    The closer people search sites cut it the great the pressure will be to pass more stringent laws about online privacy.  When that happens the laws are likely to go far beyond opt out policies.  That time may come, but why force the issue by refusing to have an opt out policy?

    Halsey - follow her @pseudohalsey

  • The Internet Is Stalking Your Grandparents

    2012-05-25

    The Internet doesn’t mean the same thing to everyone; the way we use it is defined, more than any other factor, by our age.  And that defines the extent to which it uses us.

    When Pew first started researching the Internet in American life in 2000, socio-economic differences were the defining variable in whether and how people used the Internet.  ISPs weren’t willing to build out expensive broadband connections in low-income communities and without access, residents of lower income areas were less likely to go online at all.  But that was twelve years, and many Internet lifetimes, ago!  Today, most adults are online but not all, not by a long shot.  Even with a proliferation of inexpensive Internet options, one in five adults in the US still doesn’t use the Internet; and senior citizens are the least likely to be on the Internet.  Age has become more important than poverty in determining whether someone is online.

    Unlike younger adults, senior citizens are less likely to have had jobs that required Internet or email use.  Even those who used the Internet professionally are less likely to communicate with friends via the Internet and may not see the need to have Internet at home.

    Even if a senior citizen has never heard of Internet, that doesn’t mean that the Internet has never heard of them.  Personal information makes its way to the Internet through corporate, government and private channels, many of which gather their information offline initially.  Once the information is online it’s only a Google search away.

    The result of all of this is that there is a large group of adults who may not know what information about them is online.  Without that knowledge it is impossible to make an educated decision about whether you’re comfortable with the world having access to your information.

    It’s tempting to think that just because our parents, grandparents, aunt, uncles and older neighbors can finish the Saturday New York Times crossword puzzle over breakfast that they know everything.  Not spending any (let alone all) of their lives on the Internet wouldn’t be a problem if the Internet were purely opt in, but the barriers between online and offline interactions are only getting weaker, and accessing the Internet has long since left the exclusive realm of computer programmers.

    Now go ahead and call an older loved one, and check in with them about the last time they Googled themselves.  If they’re not familiar with the amount of information they potentially have online, through people-search websites and data-brokers, take the time to educate them.  As long as they choose not to be on the use the Internet help them avoid letting the Internet use them.


    Halsey @pseudohalsey

  • Google Just Nerfed Us, a Venture-Backed Startup

    2012-05-17

    [ UPDATE: With help from Pierre Far and Matt Cutts, it seems that a rel canonical will help stem the issue.  http://www.safeshepherd.com, http://safeshepherd.com, https://www.safeshepherd.com and https://safeshepherd.com all vied for rank.. and lost in a split vote ]

    Well, you’ve stumped me, Google.  We’re a ventured-backed startup that’s been getting a bunch of mainstream press.  This should be great for SEO, right?  Today, we no longer rank for our own name.  Google just nerfed us.

      Yeah, our blog is doing just fine..

    Here’s what Google is telling me in Webmaster Tools.  For 2,500 impressions at rank 1 on keywords Safe Shepherd, we’ve had 2,000 clicks (80% CTR).  A few days ago we were mentioned on CNN HLN’s Morning Express and had 1,300 clicks out of 1,300 impressions (wooh!).  In the days following though, our impressions and clicks have gone to zero, kaput.  I can’t find our homepage in search anymore (I stopped when I got to page 10 and “What Human Food Is Safe for a Shepherd Dog? | eHow.com”).  But when I search site:safeshepherd.com, it’s there.  So what gives?

    We launched MelonCard.com back in August.  Knowing the name was liable to change, we built in our site on a white-label system where every mention of our name, our logo, our domain, etc., all of it gets filtered through code which adjusts the content based on the Hostname.  This made it really easy to transition to SafeShepherd.com while keeping up MelonCard.com and gathering analytics for privacybuddy.org (that one didn’t work out).  Despite the duplicated content, this is exactly what Google suggests for doing a domain name change.  We just completed the transition yesterday with 301-redirects, and all done by the book.

    [ EDIT: To clarify: The issue is that the domain “safeshepherd.com” used to rank for the search “Safe Shepherd”.  Now it doesn’t.  MelonCard.com’s page rank juice will clearly take time to transfer, but shouldn’t bring down our ranking for SafeShepherd.com. ]

    Truly, that’s all we’ve changed.  Well, we’ve added a load balancer on our Redis servers and changed some copy, but I don’t think Google is too concerned about that.  I want to believe there’s something else we’ve done wrong.  Trust me, I’ve scoured for anything else that could have happened.  I’ve looked for misplaced rel-canonical links and checked Alexa to see the sites linking in to us.  Nothing has changed in our sitemap.xml, Google lists nothing blocked by robots.txt, nothing.  Is it a change in Google?  I hear we’re top-ranked on Google Japan.

    Have we hired a circus of link spammers or turks writing low-quality SEO?  No.  We’ve just strived to gain users and community with high quality back-links through press (Forbes, TIME.com, LifeHacker, etc.), and now I feel betrayed by the mystery of Google’s search algorithm.  I understand Google fights to deliver spam-free results, but I don’t understand why I wasn’t informed with a nice little message like, “Hey, we think you hired click-spam.  Find out more or contact a representative.”  It’s been quiet over here.

    I’d love any help, any feedback on what we could have done wrong or how I can get some diagnostics to fix this hiccup.  I’ve gone through every tool and number that Google Webmaster has given me.  What else have I missed?  Kudos to whoever can help me get through this one.

    Or hell, I guess we can always come up with a new company which’ll have a clean slate for search rankings.

  • How to write an intro email like a BOSS

    2012-05-03

    I’ve been receiving quite a few terribly written introduction emails lately.  Intro emails that don’t actually introduce anybody, and add more confusion than add value.  This is a problem, so I wrote a quick template for my team to use, when in doubt.  As with many things, open source is best for the community, so here’s how I view introduction etiquette:

    1. If I’m introducing two people of my own accord, they both are the To: recipient.  If one person is requesting an intro, I put them in the CC: field, and the person that is sought goes in the To: field.
    2. Subject: Firstname(A) <—> Firstname(B)
    3. Whoever is being sought has higher standing and priority than the individual requesting the introduction.  In the event you are making an introduction of your own accord, determine who is more senior, or more time-constrained; the higher-status recipient should be addressed first.
    4. Assume neither party has any knowledge of the other.  Your introduction should summarize how you know them, who they are, and why they are relevant and interesting to the other party.  If there is a specific matter of business to be discussed, that should be included.  That’s it.  Don’t wax poetic or waste time; less is more.
    5. Let them take it from there.
    6. Bonus: If you’re the recipient of an intro email, respond within 24 hours or risk embarrassment and shame.

    Ready for a sample? Here goes.

    To: SamAngel@gmail.com

    CC: Beatz99@gmail.com

    Subject: Sam <—> Noah

    ——————————-

    Sam,

    I’d like to introduce you to Noah Wishbone, a dubstep DJ who is building a virtual online club for dubstep and brostep DJ’s to play live, interactive concerts for their fans; it’s like Turntable but niche, and without avatars.  I’ve known Noah since we studied music-theory together at NYU.  Since then, Noah founded and exited BroTown, an online music message board website.

    Noah, Sam is an avid music lover and is incredibly interested in music startups.  He’s an advisor to my company, and has always helped me think through important strategic decisions.  I expect he’d have some great input on what you’re working on.

    I’ll let you two take it from here.

    Best, Robert

    @rleshner

  • I’ve Read Every Privacy Policy on the Internet— This is What I’ve Learned

    2012-04-05

    We’ve been working on a project to analyze and classify every privacy policy on the Internet. Yeah, that’s from the 5,000,000,000 websites included in AWS’s Common Crawl Corpus.  We are classifying what information a given website collects about you and what they choose to do with that information. Along the way, I’ve already learned some new technical skills ranging from Naive Bayes classification to running a streaming elastic MapReduce in Ruby.  But, I’ve also learned a lot about online privacy and just how most websites treat your personal information.

    “Non-personally identifying information” actually is

     Privacy policies divide the information received into two buckets— personally identifying and non-personally identifying. Most sites then have a policy of protecting that first bucket, not selling or renting it out. As for the other bucket, they give themselves free rein to aggregate it, sell it or plain give it away.

    What’s surprising is that personal information like IP-address and unique tracking cookies are not placed in that first bucket. Every time you or your wife or kids login to websites on the same machine, they all know who you are. What’s more, most people can be identified by their browser’s unique User-Agent features alone.

    Putting a pretty face on handing out your personal information.

    The scariest phrase to find in a privacy policy is “trusted partners.” Said “trusted partners” are being shared or sold your personal information. Other good legalese techniques include creative uses of the word “unless” or “except,” covering every conceivable case. Take for example the privacy policy of Coupons.com:

    We do not share personally identifiable information with our Affiliates or other third-parties for their marketing or promotional uses except as part of a specific program or feature that you have chosen to participate in. For example, we offer coupons on our Sites that require you to fill out an advertiser survey in order to receive the coupon.

    Read: “We can share whatever you provide us whenever you touch or interact with our site”

    Network Effects

    Most sites recognize that their users are opposed to their private information being shared with third parties without a good reason (to say: there are good reasons. We use Stripe for payments and MixPanel for analytics). While often websites limit or even rule out “third-party sharing,” they opt for allowing the sharing of your information with “affiliates”— companies under the same privacy policy and corporate umbrella. The scary thing about this is the wide reach of some corporate networks. For example, would you have guessed that gamespot.com and cnet.com can share your personal data with one another because they’re both part of CBS Interactive?  It’s not infrequent for a website’s affiliate network to include thousands of external organizations in unrelated markets.

    Everyone that’s anybody is using a (third-party) tracking service

    Nearly every website in the world is using a third-party tracking service, of which Google Analytics is indisputably the most popular. A rarely discussed loophole in Internet Privacy is that everyone’s online behavior is being gathered across several websites and funneled into these large analytics networks. Does it ever creep you out that Google happily collects massive usage and consumer data from Your website (including paid conversions) and then presents you a slice of it?

    Don’t want to read Privacy Policies, but do care about Privacy? We’re here to help

    • Remove your personal information with SafeShepherd. We opt you out of the data brokers which end up with your information after these privacy-disrespecting sites leak it out
    • Check out Ghostery, which identifies and blocks those third-party trackers
    • If you want to go the extra mile, use Tor, anonymousspeech and the new project privly to hide your IP, identity, and content respectively, while still using all the same services that your privacy-ambivalent brethren benefit from
    • More reading? Reference: knowprivacy.org — a project which categorized 50 policies and helped a lot with our current project and knowledge

    -Ben

    @bsgreenb

    SafeShepherd.com

  • Startup chaos, and Crashing our way into 500 Startups

    2012-03-26

    I’ve been asked to write this blog post by many, many friends over the past few months; here it is.

    Everything changed when Dave McClure checked-in on Foursquare three blocks from our apartment…

    My co-founder Geoff and I began our start-up adventure with nothing more than blind ambition, a passion for tech, a friendship going back to college (when we were roomates) and $30,000 of my personal savings.  I had just quit a high-power finance job, which seemed like a ridiculous decision at the time, and convinced Geoff to move to Chicago, hardly the hotbed of startup activity, to build a company.  We had nebulous ideas about small business, daily deals (“lol”), and building…something.  Anything.  It was March, 2011, and all Techcrunch could talk about was bubble 2.0.  We were going to ride that bubble.

    Geoff was decent with Ruby on Rails, and I was the “business guy” with a light background in circa-1998 web development.  I would play the visionary, and Geoff would develop the ideas.  Our hypothesis was that 9/10 startups fail, but if we incubated 10 different products, one of them was bound to succeed.  Geoff moved into my apartment, which became a live/work loft; living frugally, and cooking our own meals, 30k would last us all the way to traction.  To cement our experimental mindset, we set up a cheap LLC and called ourselves Chattr Labs, emphasis on the laboratory part.

    Our first product was something along the lines of About.me for Merchants; small-businesses could set up a webpage, list its menu, interact with customers (which didn’t really occur with Yelp), and offer daily deals and such.  It looked like shit.  We hired a web designer off Craigslist, increasing our burn rate, and adding another layer of communication to the development process.  Every two days I would propose a new must-have feature (based on intuition and not, actually, speaking with merchants), and Geoff would race to build it.  Practice must make perfect, because his development speed was increasing daily.  With all of my free-time as the business founder, I was reading every possible entrepreneurship/vc/tech blog, and inferred that the right course was to “launch early”.  However both Geoff and I were scared shitless of pounding pavement and selling this product.  We never considered founder-product fit, we were just building “cool stuff”.  As our arbitrary launch date approached, we increasingly expressed fear of the next step.  Was the point to commit to a project, or keep on experimenting?

    25 days into our laboratory, we took the easy way out; we decided to pull a 24-hour hackathon based on a hair-brained idea to build something “we wanted”.  It was a Friday at 9pm, and we headed to 7-11 to purchase 8 red bulls, chips, and cookies (healthy living), and set out to build an HTML5 location-based hookup app.  You read that right.  Now, the process of building an HTML5 mobile app in 24 hours, with no experience, is akin to getting drunk and stealing a bumper-car.  There’s a lot of hitting obstacles and whiplash, but its ridiculously fun.  To make the process work (sans lousy craigslist designer), I was our front-end developer, learning on the fly.  The last time I had touched HTML, tables were all the rage, there was actually a <marquee> tag, and CSS was seldom used.

    We quickly reached a development sync where we’d be coding the back and front-end in parallel, with a spoken and unspoken knowledge of the exact syntax the other was using.  Sure, my design work sucked, but it was the best we had.  By 9pm the next evening, our location-based hookup app was live; you logged in with Facebook, and could see nearby users.  You could send messages, and ‘propose a date’, whereby the app would pick a location (we scraped all of Yelp Chicago) algorithmically based on distance, stars, and # of reviews for you to meet at.  We posted some spam on craigslist telling people to use our app (lean distribution!) and headed to a bar with friends to test out our creation.  We texted everyone we knew, encouraging them to use the app, and waited.  And all of 3 people logged in.  When we asked what the problem was, everyone pointed to the same issue; connecting with Facebook, for a hook-up app, was downright creepy.

    It hit us like a ton of bricks; talking to users was awesome.  And so we took the iteration cycle of feedback, design, and development to its irrational extreme.  Every two days we’d head to the local bar and pitch our product and feature-set to everyone possible.  I’ll spare you the details, but the general timeline over the next 5 months goes something like this:

    Hookup app —> Find friends app —> Find friends for events app —> Location based event app —> Event app & website —> Event management website —> Event management & ticketing platform

    Without ever actually pivoting (a pivot starts with a clean code base, right?), we somehow found ourselves building a full-service platform to rival Eventbrite.  It was massive.  And it was beautiful.  And it had more features than you could possibly imagine.  Working 18 hour days, 7 days a week, with short breaks for entrepreneur meetups, we had evolved into a commando 2-person product team.  Yet somehow, we found ourselves right back where we started; with a product we had to sell.  Sure, we had hustled up 1,000 (mostly just curious) users, but nobody was lining up to pay us money.  We had built an amazing proprietary analytics/ split testing system as the back-end of our product; and the results all read: 0.  Our burn rate was higher than we had originally intended, there was no revenue coming in, and we had invested 5 months in a long, iterative experiment.

    This time, we hired a salesperson on commission, and I hit the pavement.  The going was rough.  Looking out the horizon, we had 3 months of runway left, and a product nobody wanted to pay for.  For the first time, conversations began to get heated, and the gut-sure confidence that we’d succeed began to wane.  It was time to get real.

    At 4am, August 3rd, after working a 19-hour workday, the lightning-bolt of entrepreneurship hit us once again.  The top post on reddit.com was a list of people-search/background-check websites, and how to opt-out and remove your personal info.  And the process sucked.  Each site has its own privacy policy, and different mechanics for opting out.  Some required a fax, some required snail-mail, some required web forms, it was a mess.  We would automate as much of that crappy technology as we could in 24 hours; for the second time, we headed to 7-11, and stocked up on energy drinks and junk food.  22 hours later, we emailed our friends a link to our new privacy tool, and crashed.

    When I woke up in the late afternoon, my inbox was flooded with responses inquiring, demanding, that we build out the product.  The nonchalant encouragement that we were used to as entrepreneurs was replaced with rabid demand.  It felt great.  But our runway was still shrinking, and now we had two products to juggle; one we had invested 5 months of development into, with little traction, the other little more than an idea with a passionate response.  We began conversations for a friends and family round, and spent more development time on our privacy tool, which we randomly named MelonCard.  There are moments in a startup where you feel simultaneously at your best and worst; this was one of them.

    That changed when Dave McClure checked-in on Foursquare three blocks from our apartment.

    As a company, we sucked terribly at social media engagement; as a skill, it didn’t come naturally to either of us as founders.  However, as we were alpha-testing MelonCard, I was spending more time on twitter @mentioning our product to folks in the privacy space (which led to some incredible early interactions).  So anyway, Dave had configured his Foursquare to auto-tweet his check-ins; the tweet read ‘Lightbank BBQ @ Smokedaddy’, Lightbank being one of three VCs in Chicago (and the Groupon backers), Smokedaddy being an amazing BBQ joint.

    “Geoff, get your shoes on, we’re going to stalk down and pitch Dave McClure”.

    “Who?”

    “He’s a baller.  He’s all about the metrics, AARRR, and being loud.  We like him.”

    “Let’s do this like Leroy Jenkins.”

    As we walked to the BBQ, Geoff asked which product we were going to pitch.  Clearly, the one we were passionate about; privacy.  We were anxious and giddy and calmed our nerves by saying “this is what old-school hustlers would do, what’s the worst that could happen?”.

    When we got to the BBQ, it was in a roped-off area outside the restaurant.  Geoff chain-smoked cigarettes to look casual, while I did surveillance trying to spot Dave.  There were about 20 people eating and drinking.  I made a mental note, he’s the guy in the red Wildfire t-shirt.  We discussed the right approach, and realized we had no idea how to proceed.  Do we brazenly crash the party?  Do we sneak in?  Do we wait outside until he has to leave, and then pitch him outright?  We chose plan D, go across the street to a bar, and drink down some liquid courage while formulating a real plan.

    Three drinks in, we agreed on a strategy; I would bee-line for Dave, and Geoff would play defense and hold back any analyst or intern that tried to bounce us.  We confidently walked across the street, walked right in…and couldn’t find Dave.

    Caught off guard, my first instinct was to approach the first table I saw, and try to blend.

    “Hi, I’m Robert Leshner”

    “Who?”

    “…I’m here for the BBQ”

    “Who are you?”

    “This is a gathering of…investors, correct?”

    “Who told you about this event?”

    “Dave McClure tweeted it out.  I’m here to pitch him.”

    “YO, Dave, did you tweet this shit out?”

    “Uhm yeah, I did”

    “These guys are here to pitch you”

    “Well come on over, boys, pull up a chair and pitch me!”

    The entire party stopped, and circled the table.  We were the center of attention.  When you’re pulling up a chair to pitch a guy you’ve only seen on Techcrunch TV, you’ve been living in the startup desert of Chicago, and you’ve never actually pitched the company you’re about to pitch, you just have to wing it.

    “Our company, MelonCard, removes your personal information from websites which sell it.”

    “Melon cart?”

    “No, MelonCarD

    “Ok, when you pitch your company, and the name is confusing, make sure you really accentuate the MELON and the CARD.  Maybe carry around a melon or something, and a card.”

    “Uhm, ok, so MelonCarD removes your personal information from websites which sell it.  We want to centralize and streamline privacy, and be the destination where people go to manage their personal information online.”

    “Are you live?”

    “Yes, we’re currently in an alpha test”

    “How do you define ‘alpha’ test?”

    “We’ve told 100 people, and 98 creamed their pants.”

    Genius.  He handed me his business card, and explained the process; find a few mentors in the 500 network which we like, which would add value to our business, and convince them that we’re a good fit.  If I needed help connecting with any of them, he’d make an introduction.  Seemed easy enough.  As George Costanza would do, we were about to bounce on a high note.

    “Stick around, we’ll play a fun game”

    “…..ok…we were going to leave now…”

    “Its called Half Baked dot-com”

    For the un-initiated, Half Baked dot-com is a game in which everyone is in a circle, the game proceeds clockwise, and the two people to your right each say a random word.  With no preparation, you have to pitch a tech company…named with those two words.  Dave demonstrated, and the two individuals to his right said “Duck” and “Umbrella”.  So, Dave pitched a hard-hat company that gave away free product on construction sites, loaded with advertisements around the hard-hat.  He made it look easy enough.  My words were “Paper” and “Candelabra” (thanks, Dave), so I pitched a subscription company that mails candles and disposable candelabras.  There was discussion of fire risk, but I was caught up in the moment.  As Geoff (to my left) was sweating bullets, Dave stood up, and announced that he had to catch a plane, sparing my co-founder his turn at Half Baked.  As an aside, if you’re a founder, and have never played, this is the game for you.

    For the audacity of it, our stalking, crashing, and pitching proved to be a turning point in our company’s history.  A few weeks later we drove from Chicago to California, joined 500 Startups, and set in motion the creation of a real company.  More on that some other day.

    -Robert (@rleshner)

    Source: safeshepherd.com

  • Quotes About BeenVerified

    2012-03-16

    While making the Infographic about BeenVerified.com we came upon a bunch of user complaints that really motivated us to expose some of the bad business principles that BeenVerified.com practices.

     If you haven’t seen the infographic yet, check it out here: Been Verified Scam Revealed

    Here are some of the most disturbing quotes: 

    These type of misleading offers should be shut down by the government as they ensnare millions of consumers every year, Stay away from BeenVerified.com at all costs, it’s nothing but a scam.” 

    “Not only is BeenVerified a scam theyre liars and thieves.”

    “The story doesn’t end there because Been Verified took my credit card number and even though I canceled the first day of my free trial they kept on billing me.  I’ve tried to get with their customer service to stop the charges on my credit card but this company just don’t respond to my queries. With five children to feed I can’t afford to get charges on my card”

    “BeenVerfied billed me for the last 4 months and I have not been able to get them to cancel my account. I called my credit card company to do a chargeback and the customer service rep said they’ve had numerous problems with BeenVerified  and she told me to just report my credit card lost/stolen to stop them from billing me.  In the end I had to report my credit card as lost  to stop BeenVerified from billing me.”

    “This really is more like a great tool for stalkers and a bad idea for citizens who may let thier guard down due to a false sense of security.”

    “I had to call them on the phone 7, yes “7” different times and spend over 2 hours. Each person I talked to gave me a completely different runaround and two even hung up on me.  I read this review and saw the one guy say he just reported his credit card stolen to prevent BeenVerified.com from scamming him with repeat charges, so that’s what I ended up doing.”

    “Had my girlfriend check just for fun. It said I was a child molester. Almost Lost my girlfriend until I explained a molester would have to register. We checked and sure enough not even in any data base. They suck don’t use, These people.”

    My husband was killed in March 1987.  The person who killed him was tried, and convicted in 1992.  The defendant went to jail and was released last July after only serving 18 yrs out of a 25-life sentence. The defendant being savvy and enraged at being incarcerated has been using been verified.com to try to find “me”.  I called, wrote, called and wrote over 500 times to not just beenverified.com but to dozens of other companies who when you put my name in their data base my address pops up, this madman that killed my husband doesn’t need anything else to find me since these big companies are handing out my address like it was candy.  Why isn’t the government or any other lesser government agency doing nothing to protect the victims of violent crimes? Who looks out for us?”

    And thats why SafeShepherd does what it does.  Everyday, millions of Americans are being opted in to have their personal information sold without their consent.  SafeShepherd endeavors to standardize and expedite this opt-out process so that people can be assured that their personal information is safe, and can be shared with who they want, and not who pays for it.

    Sources:

    http://gripevines.com/index.php?topic=473.0

    http://www.sitejabber.com/reviews/www.beenverified.com

    http://www.ripoffreport.com/Search/beenverified.aspx

    Source: safeshepherd.com

  • Why We Do What We Do

    2012-03-12

    During my first few weeks at SafeShepherd I have been learning a lot about our product and about our users.  We help normal people take better control of their privacy by simplifying the process of removing personal information from people search websites and online data brokers.  Most of our users use us to have more privacy, and stop marketers from abusing their personal information.  However, others have a greater reason.

    This is a message that I read on the public forum, ripoffreport.com: 

    “My husband was killed in March 1987.  The person who killed him was tried, and convicted in 1992.  The defendant went to jail and was released last July after only serving 18 yrs out of a 25-life sentence. The defendant being savvy and enraged at being incarcerated has been using been verified.com to try to find “me”.  I called, wrote, called and wrote over 500 times to not just beenverified.com but to dozens of other companies who when you put my name in their data base my address pops up, this madman that killed my husband doesn’t need anything else to find me since these big companies are handing out my address like it was candy.  Why isn’t the government or any other lesser government agency doing nothing to protect the victims of violent crimes? Who looks out for us?”

    After I reading this I immediately reached out to the author of the post offering them a free premium subscription to SafeShepherd so that we could remove her from not only BeenVerified.com, but from all of the people search websites.  I have yet to hear back from her.

    As the community manager at SafeShepherd it is a good feeling to be able to help users have peace of mind and regain control of their privacy, but it really scares me when I read these types of posts.  If you or someone you know is being threatened please contact the police.  If removing yourself from people search and data broker  websites will improve your privacy, than please contact me at noah@safeshepherd.com.

    -Noah

    Source: safeshepherd.com

  • The NSA: Exactly What Our Founding Fathers Didn’t Want

    2012-02-27

    During this morning’s daily Twitter scan I came across an interesting infographic about the NSA.  We all know that since the Patriot Act was passed the NSA has been illegally intercepting American’s phone calls and emails without warrants or suspicion of wrongdoing.  Also, the NSA is now so large and secretive, that no one knows how many people it employs, how many programs exist, and how many of your tax payer dollars are going to fund it.  Here are some scary facts about the NSA:

    -The NSA intercepts and stores 1.7 billion emails, phone calls, texts, and other electronic communications every day.  This amount of information is equal to 138 million books every 24 hours.

    -The NSA has more employees than the FBI and CIA combined and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has a workforce of over 230,000 people (the third-largest after the departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs).

    -In 2008 the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) gave immunity to the warrantless wiretapping program started in 2001, meaning that they don’t need warrants, probable cause, or any type of transparency for the actions they take.

    -Even with all their resources, the NSA and DHS are surprisingly ineffective.  According to the Washington Post, officials knew that Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab could be a potential threat to American citizens.  However, when he tried to ignite explosives hidden in his underwear on a flight from Amsterdam to Detroit, it wasn’t the NSA or DHS that stopped him, but a fellow passenger that tackled and detained him.

    It seems like the NSA and DHS are much more effective at spying on America’s citizens than protecting them.  Besides infringing on individual freedoms, liberties, and privacy the NSA and DHS are jeopardizing the values that our country was founded on.  Tonight, when you go to bed and drift off into a peaceful slumber, don’t forget that your emails are being read, your phone calls recorded, and that our founding fathersare rolling over in their graves.

    -Noah

    Sources:

    http://projects.washingtonpost.com/top-secret-america/articles/a-hidden-world-growing-beyond-control/print/

    http://www.aclu.org/national-security/nsa-unchained-infographic

    Source: safeshepherd.com

  • Consumer Privacy Bill Of Rights Only Touches The Surface

    2012-02-23

    Today Washington addressed growing concerns in online privacy by unveiling a framework for a Consumer Privacy Bill Of Rights.  While the bill helps provide more privacy from the visible threat, aka companies you have day-to-day relationships with such as Google, Apple, Yahoo, and Microsoft, it is still largely ignoring the massive industry that is built on selling your personal information behind the scenes.  

    This is from the White House privacy white paper:

    Still, data brokers and other companies that collect personal data without direct consumer interactions or a reasonably detectable presence in consumer-facing activities should seek innovative ways to provide consumers with effective Individual Control. If it is impractical to provide Individual Control, these companies should ensure that they implement other elements of the Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights in ways that adequately protect consumers’ privacy. For example, to provide sufficient privacy protections, such companies may need to go to extra lengths to implement other principles such as Transparency—by providing clear, public explanations of the roles they play in commercial uses of personal data—as well as providing appropriate use controls once information is collected under the Access and Accuracy and Accountability principles to compensate for the lack of a direct consumer relationship.

    At this stage the bill is requiring no extra requirements on these data brokers, meaning that most Americans are still clueless to the fact that their personal information is not only being sold behind their backs, but is easily accessible to anyone with an internet connection. 

    While Washington is taking a step in the right direction, the new bill is only touching the surface of an issue and industry that needs more visibility, transparency, and regulation.

    -Noah

    Source: safeshepherd.com